• Vasile Manole “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi
  • Florin Negoescu “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi
  • Laurentiu Slatineanu “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi
  • Ramona Stanila University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest
  • Ana Badanac “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi
Keywords: machinability by classical machining methods, nonconventional technologies, machinability indexes, drilling under constant force feed, empirical mathematical model


Between the machinability by classical machining methods and use of nonconventional technologies there is a certain correlation. When the machining by classical methods is not possible or it is difficult to be applied, one can took into consideration the use of nonconventional technologies. The documentary research showed that that the empirical models corresponding to the tool wear, cutting forces and roughness of the machined surface, considered also as machinability indexes, take into consideration characteristics of the workpiece material. In order to improve the conditions of developing a machinability evaluation by drilling under constant force feed, a machining schema involving the work feed movement of the test piece from up to down, to the rotating drilling tool, was proposed. The experimental research led to a power type empirical mathematical model able to highlight the influence exerted by the rotation speed, drilling tool diameter and the force feed on the length of hole achieved in a certain time.


1. El-Hoffy H., Fundamentals of machining processes: conventional and non-conventional processes, 1st ed., CRC press, (2006).
2. Hocheng, H., Tsai, H.-Y., Advanced analysis of non-traditional machining, Springer, (2013).
3. Karaguzel, U., Olgun, U., Uysal, E., Budak, E., Bakkal, M., Increasing tool life in machining of difficult-to-cut materials using nonconventional turning processes, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Vol. 77, pp. 1993-2004, (2015).
4. Manole V., Slătineanu, L., Olaru, S.C., Iurea, P., Goncalves-Coelho, A., Results of an experimental research concerning the evaluation of machinability by drilling under constant feed force, IManE 2015 Conference, 21-22 May 2015, Iaşi, Romania, (2015).
5. Mascenik J., Gaspar S., Experimental assessment of roughness changes in the cutting surface and microhardness changes of the material S 355 J2 G3 after being cut by non-conventional technologies, Advanced Materials Research Vols. 314-316, pp. 1944-1947, (2011).
6. Picoş, C., Machine manufacturing technology (in Romanian), Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucharest, (1974).
7. Pradeep Kumar, G., Soundarrajan, M., Rajkumar, P., An experimental investigation of machinability of stainless steel 316 using brass electrodes, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, Special Issue 6, May, pp. 640-649, (2015).
8. Rhoades, L. J., Applying nontraditional machining techniques for improved turbine engine designs, available at file:///C:/Users/TN5/Downloads/ V005T11A010-89-GT-267.pdf, accessed: 23.06.2015.
9. Sidda Reddy, D., Seshu Kumar, A., Sreenivasa Rao, M., Parametric optimization of abrasive water jet machining of Inconel 800H using Taguchi methodology, Universal Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 158-162, (2014).
How to Cite
Manole, V., Negoescu, F., Slatineanu, L., Stanila, R., & Badanac, A. (2015). CORRELATION BETWEEN MACHINABILITY BY CLASSICAL MACHINING METHODS AND USE OF NONCONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES. Nonconventional Technologies Review, 19(2). Retrieved from

Most read articles by the same author(s)