TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR SUPPORTING CIRCULARITY IN THE WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY

  • Silvia Tofana Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
  • Mihai Dragomir Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
  • Denisa Szabo Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
  • Mihail Titu "Lucian Blaga" University Of Sibiu
Keywords: circular economy, wood products, wood waste, reclaimed wood

Abstract

The paper presents a combined approach for technology capability assessment, that includes a generic analysis of circularity technologies and methods, and an applied case study for a Romanian wood products manufacturer. The methodology uses Analytical Hierarchy Process for ranking the potential circularity enabling technologies and Quality Function Deployment to determine the recommended strategy for product families that use them. Starting from mixed general and specific inputs, and applying these two investigation steps, the authors propose some organizational interventions. The results are useful for companies in the forestry sector that are considering technical and business transformations towards circularity, while remaining competitive.

References

[1] M. A. Țîțu, A. Stanciu and Ș. Țîțu, “Business Process Outsourcing. Integrity in an era of
digital transformation,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Control and Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2018.
[2] T. Salem and M. Dragomir, “Options for and Challenges of Employing Digital Twins in
construction Management,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 2928, 2022.
[3] S. Popescu, M. Dragomir, D. Pitic and E. Brad, “Method for competitive environmental
planning,” Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 823-828, 2012.
[4] F. Iliescu, S. Popescu, M. Dragomir and D.Dragomir, “Public–private partnership in the
water sector in Romania: success or failure?,”Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1249-1256, 2013.
[5] S. Popescu, D. Rusu, M. Dragomir, D. Popescu and S. Nedelcu, “Competitive development
tools in identifying efficient educational interventions for improving pro-environmental and recycling behavior,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 156, 2020.
[6] Silvania International Prod, “Produse Silvania,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.silvaniabn.ro/produse. [Accessed 20 December 2022].
[7] B. Gagnon, X. Tanguay, B. Amor and A. F.Imbrogno, “Forest Products and Circular Economy Strategies: A Canadian Perspective,”Energies, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 673, 2022.
[8] L. Diaz-Balteiro, C. Romero and S. G. de Jalón, “An analysis of the degree of circularity of the wood products industry in Europe,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 26, pp. 1350-1363,
2022.
[9] S. Schuster and S. Geier, “CircularWOOD –Towards Circularity in Timber Construction in
the German Context,” vol. 1078, p. 012030, 2022.
[10] E. Takahagi, “AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Calculation software by CGI,” 2005.
[Online]. Available: http://www.isc.senshu-u.ac.jp/~thc0456/EAHP/AHPweb.html.[Accessed 21 December 2022].
Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Tofana, S., Dragomir, M., Szabo, D., & Titu, M. (2022). TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR SUPPORTING CIRCULARITY IN THE WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY. Nonconventional Technologies Review, 26(4). Retrieved from http://revtn.ro/index.php/revtn/article/view/393