COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PLASMA AND LASER CUTTING OF STEELS AND POLYMERIC MATERIALS

  • Daniel Ghiculescu Polytechnic University of Bucharest
  • Liviu Nita Polytechnic University of Bucharest
  • Jozsef Pop Polytechnic University of Bucharest
  • Andrei Rusu Polytechnic University of Bucharest
Keywords: laser cutting, plasma, steels, polymers, FEA

Abstract

The paper deals with comparative study between plasma and laser cutting of different materials. C 45 and stainless steel were cut by these mentioned above technologies with different working parameters. The surface quality was studied using scanning electron microscopy. The comparison was extended in the same manner, at laser cutting of some polymeric materials like PVC and Plexiglas. COMSOL Multiphysics, Heat transfer module was used in a dynamic variant with a sweep parameter as machining time in connection to feed rate, aiming at improvement of output technological parameters at plasma and laser cutting. A Gaussian distribution of the energy on laser and plasma spot was introduced as boundary conditions, as well as thermal characteristics of the studied materials. The quality of machined surface was considered based on moderate heating of the material. Some values of working parameters were established due to computerized modelling. These were validated by experimental results.

References

1. Krajcarz, D., Comparison Metal Water Jet Cutting with Laser and Plasma Cutting, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 69, pp. 838-843, (2014).
2. Marinescu, N.I. et al., Technological processes with beams, oscillations, and jets, Printech, Bucharest, (2019).
3. Varga, G., Ferencsik, V., Analysis of shape correctness of surfaces of diamond burnished components, Modern Technologies in Manufacturing, MTeM – AMaTUC, Trans Tech Publications, 137(4):01019, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (2017).
4. Mangaraj, S.R. et al., Experimental study of a portable plasma arc cutting system using hybrid RSM-nature inspired optimization technique, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 50, Part 5, Pages 867-878, (2022).
5. Auz C, F.G., et al. Comparative Analysis of Plasma Cutting Parameters Between K100 and W300 Steels, Innovation and Research - A Driving Force for Socio-Econo-Technological Development. CI3 2021, Vol. 511. Springer, (2022).
6. Anakhov, S.V., Guzanov, B.N. & Matushkin, A.V., Development of Equipment and Technology for Precision Air-Plasma Cutting of Plate Steel, Steel Transl. Vol. 52, pp.19–26 (2022).
7. Elsheikh, A.H., Muthuramalingam, T., Abd Elaziz, M. et al. Minimization of fume emissions in laser cutting of polyvinyl chloride sheets using genetic algorithm. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 19, pp. 6331–6344 (2022)
8. Kechagias, J.D., Ninikas, K., Petousis, M. et al. Laser cutting of 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene plates for dimensional and surface roughness optimization. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 119, pp. 2301–2315 (2022).
9. Kechagias, J.D. et al. Surface characteristics investigation of 3D-printed PET-G plates during CO2 laser cutting, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 37, Issue 11, (2022).
10. Vora, H.D., et al. One-dimensional multipulse laser machining of structural alumina: evolution of surface topography. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 68, 69–83 (2013).
11. Hirvijoki, E. et al., The Gaussian radial basis function method for plasma kinetic theory, Physics Letters A, Vol. 379, Issue 42, pp. 2735-2739, (2015).
Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Ghiculescu, D., Nita, L., Pop, J., & Rusu, A. (2022). COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PLASMA AND LASER CUTTING OF STEELS AND POLYMERIC MATERIALS. Nonconventional Technologies Review, 26(4). Retrieved from http://revtn.ro/index.php/revtn/article/view/401